Your “Nostalgia For a Digital Object” essay is so off the wall.. Quicktime of all things to romanticize… ok … you think it glitches up and you find a charm in that and it’s miniature size… how do you know your computer isn’t just bugged up and running slow.. it’s miniature size… well crap you can make any window frame smaller…
I feel like you’re trying pretentiously hard to sound knowledgeable, yes we know you’re smart, you went to UCLA, you are a theorist with ideas I can’t possibly understand… but crapp.. you wrote the most pointless analytical essay on quicktime and it’s long and jarring! I have a headache from ur repetitious use of words you know we can’t understand, and then you pair em in combination with other words as if you’re encrypting a big ‘fuck you i know more than you i’m so smart and deep’ message traced out in the gaps of ur sentences.
well I just read ur fucking essay 20 times now and I get SOME of it.. but I don’t really agree with any of it… Can you please be less boring and snobby, and write something useful and entertaining at the same time? You can have your cake and eat it too you know…
here’s a link to her cement blockheaded essay (your head will feel like cement after reading)
http://mfj-online.org/journalPages/MFJ34/VivianSobchack.html
and here’s some dude who is basically explaining her “memory box” concept but, the layout looks nicer… but it’s not any easier to digest…
